Angel De Leon v. Eric Holder, Jr.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A74-257-724. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998418230] [10-1286]

Download PDF
Angel De Leon v. Eric Holder, Jr. Doc. 0 Case: 10-1286 Document: 24 Date Filed: 09/03/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1286 ANGEL DE LEON, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 25, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hugo Cesar Castro, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Rebecca Hoffberg, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-1286 Document: 24 Date Filed: 09/03/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Angel De Leon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") dismissing his appeal from the immigration We judge's denial of his application for adjustment of status. have reviewed the record and the Board's order and affirm the denial of relief for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: De Leon (B.I.A. Feb. 25, 2010); see Ramirez v. Holder, 609 F.3d 331, 335-37 (4th under for Cir. 8 2010) U.S.C. of (holding that an alien who is is inadmissible ineligible 1255(i) review. legal before 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) status we pursuant deny the to (2006) 8 adjustment U.S.C. for (2006)). Accordingly, petition We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional contentions the court would process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?