Joe Teague, Jr. v. NCDOT
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:07-cv-00045-F. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998477605] [10-1385]
Joe Teague, Jr. v. NCDOT
Doc. 0
Case: 10-1385 Document: 15
Date Filed: 12/03/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1385 JOE E. TEAGUE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NCDOT, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00045-F) Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joe E. Teague, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ebony Jeanelle Pittman, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-1385 Document: 15
Date Filed: 12/03/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: Joe Edwards Teague, Jr., appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his motion seeking to re-open the
appeal period in the underlying civil action. the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm Teague v. NCDOT, We
for the reasons stated by the district court.
No. 5:07-cv-00045-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2009; Mar. 8, 2010). dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?