Joe Teague, Jr. v. NCDOT


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:07-cv-00045-F. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998477605] [10-1385]

Download PDF
Joe Teague, Jr. v. NCDOT Doc. 0 Case: 10-1385 Document: 15 Date Filed: 12/03/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1385 JOE E. TEAGUE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NCDOT, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00045-F) Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joe E. Teague, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ebony Jeanelle Pittman, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-1385 Document: 15 Date Filed: 12/03/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Joe Edwards Teague, Jr., appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his motion seeking to re-open the appeal period in the underlying civil action. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm Teague v. NCDOT, We for the reasons stated by the district court. No. 5:07-cv-00045-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2009; Mar. 8, 2010). dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?