Kevin Campbell v. Charles Cathcart
Filing
Amending order/opinion filed [998831630] amending and superseding Unpublished per curiam Opinion [998597908-2]. Originating case numbers: 2:06-cv-03283-DCN,2:06-cv-01121-DCN,2:07-cv-00593-DCN,2:07-cv-00790-DCN,2:07-cv-02964-DCN,2:07-cv-02965-DCN,2:07-cv-02992-DCN. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Charles Cathcart, Evelyn Cathcart, and Yuri Debevc. [10-1389]
Appeal: 10-1389
Document: 54
Date Filed: 04/12/2012
Page: 1 of 10
Filed:
April 12, 2012
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1389
(2:06-cv-03283-DCN; 2:06-cv-01121-DCN;
2:07-cv-00593-DCN; 2:07-cv-00790-DCN;
2:07-cv-02964-DCN; 2:07-cv-02965-DCN;
2:07-cv-02992-DCN)
KEVIN CAMPBELL, Chapter 7 Trustee; GENERAL HOLDINGS,
INCORPORATED, a California Corporation; ALAN M. GRAYSON;
AMG TRUST; ROBERT G. SABELHAUS; MELANIE R. SABELHAUS;
NEWTON FAMILY LLC; WCN-GAN PARTNERS LTD, a Colorado
partnership,
Plaintiffs – Appellees,
v.
CHARLES D. CATHCART; YURI DEBEVC; EVELYN CATHCART,
Defendants – Appellants,
and
DERIVIUM CAPITAL USA, INCORPORATED; VERIDIA SOLUTIONS, LLC;
BANCROFT VENTURES LIMITED; DERIVIUM CAPITAL LLC; SHENANDOAH
HOLDINGS LTD; SPENCER PARTNERS LTD; COLIN BOWEN; NIGEL
HARLEY WOOD; PAUL ANTHONY JARVIS; ALEXANDER JEEVES; BRYAN
JEEVES; THE JEEVES GROUP, a/k/a The Jeeves Company, Ltd,
a/k/a Jeeves Holdings Ltd; OPTECH LIMITED; WITCO; CHARLES
HSIN; PTS INTERTECH INCORPORATED; AQUILIUS INCORPORATED;
BANCROFT VENTURES UK LTD; ISLE OF MAN ASSURANCE LTD; DMITRY
BOURIAK; VISION INTERNATIONAL PEOPLE GROUP PL; TOTAL
ECLIPSE INTERNATIONAL LTD; KRISTINA PHELAN; JEEVES HOLDINGS
LTD; JAVELIN LTD; LEXADMIN TRUST REG; ST VINCENT TRUST
COMPANY LTD; ST VINCENT TRUST SERVICE LTD; WINDWARD ISLES
TRUST COMPANY LTD; SELBOURNE TRUST COMPANY LTD; PELICAN
TRUST COMPANY LTD; JEEVES GROUP ASIA LTD; WACHOVIA
SECURITIES INCORPORATED; JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE
3; JOHN DOE 4; JOHN DOE 5; JOHN DOE 6; JOHN DOE 7; JOHN DOE
8; JOHN DOE 9; JOHN DOE 10; JEEVES COMPANY LTD; ORANGEBURG
METAL TREATMENT CO LLC; METARIZON LLC, f/k/a Metarizon
Appeal: 10-1389
Document: 54
Date Filed: 04/12/2012
Page: 2 of 10
Solutions
LLC;
RANDOLPH
ANDERSON;
JONATHAN
SANDIFER;
PATRICK KELLEY; ROBERT BRADENBURG; NIGEL THOMAS TEBAY;
JOANNA OVERFIELD BODELL; JEEVES GROUP OF COMPANIES, a
foreign
association;
DOES
1-20;
CHARLES
D.
CATHCART
CRUSADER
TRUST;
CATHCART
INVESTMENT
TRUST;
CATHLIT
INVESTMENT
TRUST;
DIVERSIFIED
DESIGN
ASSOCIATED
LTD;
CLIFFORD LLOYD; DAVID KEKICH; RED TREE INTERNATIONAL; FIRST
SECURITY
CAPITAL
OF
CANADA
INCORPORATED;
MARCO
TOY
INCORPORATED;
WITCO
SERVICES
UK
LTD;
MORIA
THOMPSON
MCHARRIE; DAVID ANTHONY KARRAN; NIGEL HAMPTON MCGOWAN;
FRANCIS GERRARD QUINN; PETER KEVIN PERRY; BRIAN BODELL;
ANDREW THOMAS; EDWARD J. BUDDEN; JOANNA OVERFIELD BODELL;
CONISTON MANAGEMENT LTD; ISLE OF MAN FINANCIAL TRUST LTD;
SPENCER VENTURE PARTNERS LLC; LINDSEY AG; JACK W. FLADER,
JR.; JAMES C. SUTHERLAND; ZETLAND FINANCIAL GROUP LTD;
FRANKLIN W. THOMASON; TSUEI CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED;
NOBLESTREET LTD; FINANCIAL RESOURCES GROUP LLC; STRUCTURED
SYSTEMS
AND
SOFTWARE
INCORPORATED;
EAST
BAY
CAPITAL
VENTURES LLC,
Defendants,
v.
RALPH C. MCCULLOUGH, II,
Movant,
CHARLESTON ALUMINUM LLC; WILLIAM NEWTON; PRIVATE CONSULTING
GROUP,
Third Party Defendants.
O R D E R
The Court amends its opinion filed May 25, 2011, as
follows:
On the cover sheet caption, the names of Defendants
“SCOTT CATHCART,” “VERISTEEL INCORPORATED,” “SCOTT AND WHITNEY
2
Appeal: 10-1389
Document: 54
CATHCART
FAMILY
Date Filed: 04/12/2012
TRUST,”
“WJC
Page: 3 of 10
FERNHILL
RESIDENTIAL
TRUST,”
“PERSEVERUS INCORPORATED” and “SDC FERN HILL RESIDENTIAL TRUST”
are deleted.
For the Court – By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk
3
Appeal: 10-1389
Document: 54
Date Filed: 04/12/2012
Page: 4 of 10
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1389
KEVIN CAMPBELL, Chapter 7 Trustee; GENERAL HOLDINGS,
INCORPORATED, a California Corporation; ALAN M. GRAYSON;
AMG TRUST; ROBERT G. SABELHAUS; MELANIE R. SABELHAUS;
NEWTON FAMILY LLC; WCN-GAN PARTNERS LTD, a Colorado
partnership,
Plaintiffs – Appellees,
v.
CHARLES D. CATHCART; YURI DEBEVC; EVELYN CATHCART,
Defendants – Appellants,
and
DERIVIUM CAPITAL USA, INCORPORATED; VERIDIA SOLUTIONS, LLC;
BANCROFT VENTURES LIMITED; DERIVIUM CAPITAL LLC; SHENANDOAH
HOLDINGS LTD; SPENCER PARTNERS LTD; COLIN BOWEN; NIGEL
HARLEY WOOD; PAUL ANTHONY JARVIS; ALEXANDER JEEVES; BRYAN
JEEVES; THE JEEVES GROUP, a/k/a The Jeeves Company, Ltd,
a/k/a Jeeves Holdings Ltd; OPTECH LIMITED; WITCO; CHARLES
HSIN; PTS INTERTECH INCORPORATED; AQUILIUS INCORPORATED;
BANCROFT VENTURES UK LTD; ISLE OF MAN ASSURANCE LTD; DMITRY
BOURIAK; VISION INTERNATIONAL PEOPLE GROUP PL; TOTAL
ECLIPSE INTERNATIONAL LTD; KRISTINA PHELAN; JEEVES HOLDINGS
LTD; JAVELIN LTD; LEXADMIN TRUST REG; ST VINCENT TRUST
COMPANY LTD; ST VINCENT TRUST SERVICE LTD; WINDWARD ISLES
TRUST COMPANY LTD; SELBOURNE TRUST COMPANY LTD; PELICAN
TRUST COMPANY LTD; JEEVES GROUP ASIA LTD; WACHOVIA
SECURITIES INCORPORATED; JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE
3; JOHN DOE 4; JOHN DOE 5; JOHN DOE 6; JOHN DOE 7; JOHN DOE
8; JOHN DOE 9; JOHN DOE 10; JEEVES COMPANY LTD; ORANGEBURG
METAL TREATMENT CO LLC; METARIZON LLC, f/k/a Metarizon
Solutions
LLC;
RANDOLPH
ANDERSON;
JONATHAN
SANDIFER;
PATRICK KELLEY; ROBERT BRADENBURG; NIGEL THOMAS TEBAY;
JOANNA OVERFIELD BODELL; JEEVES GROUP OF COMPANIES, a
foreign
association;
DOES
1-20;
CHARLES
D.
CATHCART
Appeal: 10-1389
Document: 54
Date Filed: 04/12/2012
Page: 5 of 10
CRUSADER
TRUST;
CATHCART
INVESTMENT
TRUST;
CATHLIT
INVESTMENT
TRUST;
DIVERSIFIED
DESIGN
ASSOCIATED
LTD;
CLIFFORD LLOYD; DAVID KEKICH; RED TREE INTERNATIONAL; FIRST
SECURITY
CAPITAL
OF
CANADA
INCORPORATED;
MARCO
TOY
INCORPORATED;
WITCO
SERVICES
UK
LTD;
MORIA
THOMPSON
MCHARRIE; DAVID ANTHONY KARRAN; NIGEL HAMPTON MCGOWAN;
FRANCIS GERRARD QUINN; PETER KEVIN PERRY; BRIAN BODELL;
ANDREW THOMAS; EDWARD J. BUDDEN; JOANNA OVERFIELD BODELL;
CONISTON MANAGEMENT LTD; ISLE OF MAN FINANCIAL TRUST LTD;
SPENCER VENTURE PARTNERS LLC; LINDSEY AG; JACK W. FLADER,
JR.; JAMES C. SUTHERLAND; ZETLAND FINANCIAL GROUP LTD;
FRANKLIN W. THOMASON; TSUEI CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED;
NOBLESTREET LTD; FINANCIAL RESOURCES GROUP LLC; STRUCTURED
SYSTEMS
AND
SOFTWARE
INCORPORATED;
EAST
BAY
CAPITAL
VENTURES LLC,
Defendants,
v.
RALPH C. MCCULLOUGH, II,
Movant,
CHARLESTON ALUMINUM LLC; WILLIAM NEWTON; PRIVATE CONSULTING
GROUP,
Third Party Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge.
(2:06-cv-03283-DCN; 2:06-cv-01121-DCN; 2:07-cv-00593DCN; 2:07-cv-00790-DCN; 2:07-cv-02964-DCN; 2:07-cv-02965-DCN;
2:07-cv-02992-DCN)
Submitted:
April 26, 2011
Decided:
May 25, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam
opinion.
2
Appeal: 10-1389
Document: 54
Date Filed: 04/12/2012
Page: 6 of 10
Charles D. Cathcart, Yuri Debevc, Evelyn Cathcart, Appellants
Pro Se.
Richard Ashby Farrier, Jr., NELSON MULLINS RILEY &
SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina; Joseph Camden
Wilson, PIERCE, HERNS, SLOAN & MCLEOD, Charleston, South
Carolina; Alisa Joy Roberts, KUBLI & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Vienna,
Virginia; Neil Keith Emge, Jr., CARLOCK, COPELAND, SEMLER &
STAIR, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina; Hugh Wilcox Buyck, BUYCK
LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3
Appeal: 10-1389
Document: 54
Date Filed: 04/12/2012
Page: 7 of 10
PER CURIAM:
Charles
Cathcart
(“Cathcart”),
Evelyn
Cathcart
(“Evelyn”), and Yuri Debevc (“Debevc”) appeal from the judgments
entered by the district court following a jury trial and the
court’s
separate
findings
of
fact
and
conclusions
of
law
in
seven district court cases that were consolidated for trial.
The jury found in favor of the Trustee, Kevin Campbell, and in
favor of Alan Grayson and the AMG Trust on their claims to
recover a fraudulent transfer from Evelyn. 1
The jury found in
favor of the Plaintiffs and against Defendants Cathcart, Debevc,
Veridia Solutions, LLC, and Derivium Capital, LLC, 2 on the claims
for
actual
fiduciary
and
constructive
duty,
and
fraudulent
violations
of
conveyance,
the
Corrupt Organization Act, 18 U.S.C.A. §§
Supp.
2010)
(“RICO”).
The
judgments
Racketeer
breach
of
Influenced
1961-1968 (West 2006 &
provided
for
joint
and
several liability.
In the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of
law,
the
district
court
ruled
on
the
non-jury
claims
for
piercing the corporate veil and alter ego and determined that
1
District court cases No. 2:07-cv-02992 and No. 2:07-cv-
00593.
2
Derivium Capital was not named a Defendant in Nos. 2:07cv-02964 or 2:07-cv-02965, which were filed by Newton Family,
LLC, and WCN/GAN Partners, Ltd. against Cathcart, Debevc, and
Veridia.
4
Appeal: 10-1389
the
Document: 54
corporate
disregarded
Date Filed: 04/12/2012
forms
and
for
Page: 8 of 10
Derivium
Cathcart
and
and
Debevc
Veridia
be
held
responsible for the debts of the corporations.
Debevc
do
not
determination
challenge
appeal
disregard
to
on
the
corporate
should
the
personally
Cathcart and
district
form
be
and
court’s
hold
them
personally liable for the debts of Derivium and Veridia.
Any
challenge to this finding is therefore abandoned.
See 4th Cir.
Local Rule 34(b); Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430
n.4 (4th Cir. 2004) (issues not argued in opining brief are
deemed abandoned).
Additionally, because the corporations are not parties
to
this
appeal,
abandoned
and
the
the
claims
district
against
court’s
the
corporations
judgments
finding
are
them
jointly and severally liable with Cathcart and Debevc are final.
“To
qualify
as
a
case
fit
for
federal-court
adjudication, an actual controversy must be extant at all stages
of
review,
Arizonans
not
for
merely
at
Official
the
time
English
v.
the
Arizona,
(1997) (internal quotation marks omitted).
this
requirement
possibly
matter.”
have
any
where
“resolution
practical
complaint
effect
520
is
U.S.
filed.”
43,
67
A case fails to meet
of
an
on
the
issue
could
outcome
of
not
the
Norfolk S. Ry. v. City of Alexandria, 608 F.3d 150,
161 (4th Cir. 2010).
In light of the fact that Cathcart and
Debevc remain personally liable for the judgments against the
5
Appeal: 10-1389
Document: 54
Date Filed: 04/12/2012
Page: 9 of 10
corporations by their failure to appeal the determination to
disregard the corporate form and by the corporations’ failure to
appeal the judgments against them, any resolution of the issues
asserted by Cathcart and Debevc would have no practical effect
on the outcome of the case.
See id.
Accordingly, the appeals
of Cathcart and Debevc are dismissed.
The
resolution
is
only
issue
Evelyn’s
properly
challenge
to
before
the
the
court
sufficiency
for
of
the
evidence to support the fraudulent conveyance judgments against
her.
“Recognizing that we may not substitute our judgment for
that of the jury or make credibility determinations, if there is
evidence on which a reasonable jury may return verdicts in favor
of Appellees, we must affirm.”
Price v. City of Charlotte,
North Carolina, 93 F.3d 1241, 1249-50 (4th Cir. 1996) (citations
omitted).
We have reviewed the evidence presented during the
four-week trial in these cases, and we find that the evidence
was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict.
Accordingly we
affirm the judgments against Evelyn.
While we grant the Appellants’ motion to exceed the
length limit on their informal brief, we deny Debevc’s motion
for
transcripts
at
government
expense,
affirm
the
judgments
against Evelyn and in favor of Kevin Campbell and Alan Grayson
and the AMG Trust, and dismiss the remainder of the appeal.
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
6
the
facts
and
We
legal
Appeal: 10-1389
Document: 54
Date Filed: 04/12/2012
Page: 10 of 10
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART;
DISMISSED IN PART
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?