In re: Jimmie Daniel


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [998342280-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998324241-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998325217-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998331924-2]. Originating case number: 4:07-cr-00341-RBH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998477595] [10-1459]

Download PDF
In re: Jimmie Daniel Doc. 0 Case: 10-1459 Document: 16 Date Filed: 12/03/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1459 In Re: JIMMIE CRAIG DANIELS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: November 18, 2010 AGEE, Circuit (4:07-cr-00341-RBH-1) Decided: December 3, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. Judges, and Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmie Craig Daniels, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-1459 Document: 16 Date Filed: 12/03/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Jimmie Craig Daniels petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. He seeks an order Our review from this court directing the district court to act. of the district court's docket reveals that the district court has denied Daniels' 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Daniels' case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma We dispense with contentions the court are and pauperis and deny Daniels' motion for release. oral argument because in the the facts and legal before adequately presented materials argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?