Qihui Huang v. Richard Wilcher

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to file ex parte document [998391086-2]; denying Motion to seal [998398539-2] Originating case number: 8:09-cv-00151-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998549360]. Mailed to: Qihui Huang. [10-1519]

Qihui Huang v. Richard Wilcher

Doc. 0

Case: 10-1519

Document: 30

Date Filed: 03/21/2011

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1519

QIHUI HUANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, and SHIELD OUR CONSTITUTIONAL organization, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD F. WILCHER, Defendant - Appellee. RIGHTS AND JUSTICE, non-profit

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:09-cv-00151-DKC)

Submitted:

February 10, 2011

Decided:

March 21, 2011

Before WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Qihui Huang, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Radding, ADELBERG, RUDOW, DORF, & HENDLER, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-1519

Document: 30

Date Filed: 03/21/2011

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Qihui Huang appeals the district court's order denying her motion to reconsider the court's order dismissing her

complaint for failure to state a claim. record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for Huang v. Wilcher, No. We strike Huang's

the reasons stated by the district court. 8:09-cv-00151-DCK (D. Md. Apr. 6, 2010).

appendix, her joint appendix, her supplemental informal opening brief, and her reply brief. We also grant Huang's motion to

"withdraw or destroy" a purportedly confidential letter Huang has attempted to file with the court. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

2