Qihui Huang v. Ryan Hick

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to supplement [998398687-2]; granting Motion to strike [998394436-2], granting Motion to strike [998366911-2]; denying Motion for other relief [998371838-2] Originating case number: 8:09-cv-00940-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998549491]. Mailed to: Qihui Huang. [10-1521]

Qihui Huang v. Ryan Hick

Doc. 0

Case: 10-1521

Document: 34

Date Filed: 03/21/2011

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1521

QIHUI HUANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, and GEORGE MCDERMOTT; SHIELD OUR CONSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE, non-profit organization, Plaintiffs, v. RYAN L. HICKS, Defendant - Appellee. RIGHTS AND

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:09-cv-00940-DKC)

Submitted:

February 10, 2011

Decided:

March 21, 2011

Before WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Qihui Huang, Appellant Pro Se. Richard T. Colaresi, KARPINSKI, COLARESI, & KARP, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-1521

Document: 34

Date Filed: 03/21/2011

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Qihui Huang appeals the district court's order denying her motion to reconsider the court's order dismissing her

complaint for failure to state a claim. record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for Huang v. Hicks, No. We deny a Huang's to

the reasons stated by the district court. 8:09-cv-00940-DCK motion styled "In (D. Md. Apr. a 12, 2010).

reviewing

decision

granting

motion

dismiss, appellate court must accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint," (emphasis in original); her motion "to permit Huang following U.S. Ct. of App. 4th Cir, Rule 28(f) for she alleged statement of facts" could "include exhibit, record, transcript, or appendix references showing the sources of the facts stated," and her motion "to supplement

record, and accept Huang formerly filed Appendixes and coming exhibits." Huang's We also grant Appellee Hicks's to motion rename to the strike joint

appendix,

deny

Huang's

motion

appendix as the appendix, grant Hicks's motion to strike Huang's reply briefs, and grant Huang's motion "to withdraw and destroy" a document that she oral has attempted to file the under facts seal. and We legal

dispense

with

argument

because

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2