Ruben Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01181-CMH-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998641713].. [10-1523]
Appeal: 10-1523
Document: 41
Date Filed: 07/28/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1523
RUBEN LAROTA-FLOREZ; CARMEN ROSA CORDOVA-PENA,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
GOLDMAN
SACHS
MORTGAGE
COMPANY,
A
New
York
Limited
Partnership; LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-01181-CMH-IDD)
Submitted:
July 25, 2011
Decided:
July 28, 2011
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher E. Brown, BROWN, BROWN & BROWN, P.C., Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellants.
Jason E. Manning, John C. Lynch,
TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 10-1523
Document: 41
Date Filed: 07/28/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ruben
Larota-Florez
and
Carmen
Rosa
Cordova-Pena
appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary
judgment
motion
on
their
judgment and quiet title.
no
reversible
error.
court’s order.
state
law
claims
for
declaratory
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly,
we
affirm
the
district
See Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortg. Co.,
No. 1:09-cv-01181-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 8, 2010; entered
Apr. 9, 2010); see also Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., N.A., 641 F.3d
617 (4th Cir. 2011).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?