Ruben Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01181-CMH-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998641713].. [10-1523]

Download PDF
Appeal: 10-1523 Document: 41 Date Filed: 07/28/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1523 RUBEN LAROTA-FLOREZ; CARMEN ROSA CORDOVA-PENA, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY, A New York Limited Partnership; LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, Defendants – Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-01181-CMH-IDD) Submitted: July 25, 2011 Decided: July 28, 2011 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher E. Brown, BROWN, BROWN & BROWN, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellants. Jason E. Manning, John C. Lynch, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 10-1523 Document: 41 Date Filed: 07/28/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ruben Larota-Florez and Carmen Rosa Cordova-Pena appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on their judgment and quiet title. no reversible error. court’s order. state law claims for declaratory We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm the district See Larota-Florez v. Goldman Sachs Mortg. Co., No. 1:09-cv-01181-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 8, 2010; entered Apr. 9, 2010); see also Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., N.A., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir. 2011). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?