Shannon Kelly v. West Virginia Board of Law

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to strike [998395216-2] Originating case number: 2:08-cv-00933-DAF Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998548166]. Mailed to: Shannon Kelly. [10-1554]

Shannon Kelly v. West Virginia Board of Law

Doc. 0

Case: 10-1554

Document: 15

Date Filed: 03/18/2011

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1554

SHANNON KELLY, Petitioner ­ Appellant, v. WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, a West Virginia state agency; LAWRENCE M. SHULTZ, in his official capacity as President of the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners; ANCIL G. RAMEY, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners; SUE ANN HOWARD, in her official capacity as a member of the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners; WARD D. STONE, JR., in his official capacity as a member of the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners; BRADLEY J. PYLES, in his official capacity as a member of the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners; SARAH N. HALL, in her official capacity as a member of the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners; JOHN F. CYRUS, in his official capacity as a member of the West Virginia Board of Law Examiners, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00933-DAF)

Submitted:

February 11, 2011

Decided:

March 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-1554

Document: 15

Date Filed: 03/18/2011

Page: 2

Shannon Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Hedges, Stephanie Shepherd, BYRNE, HEDGES & LYONS, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Case: 10-1554

Document: 15

Date Filed: 03/18/2011

Page: 3

PER CURIAM: Shannon Kelly appeals the district court's order

entering judgment in favor of the Respondents in his complaint alleging Americans with Disabilities Act, due process, and equal protection violations. reversible error. by the district We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated court. Kelly v. West Virginia Bd. of Law

Exam'rs., No. 2:08-cv-00933-DAF (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 31 & Apr. 16, 2010). We deny the Appellees' motion to strike the Appellant's We dispense with oral argument because

informal reply brief.

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. AFFIRMED

3