In re: William Reavis, Sr.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998353659-2], updating fee code. Originating case number: 4:07-cr-00075-JBF-JEB-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998449321] [10-1572]

Download PDF
In re: William Reavis, Sr. Doc. 0 Case: 10-1572 Document: 6 Date Filed: 10/20/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1572 In Re: WILLIAM PENN REAVIS, SR., Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: October 14, 2010 (4:07-cr-00075-JBF-JEB-1) Decided: October 20, 2010 Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Penn Reavis, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-1572 Document: 6 Date Filed: 10/20/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: William Penn Reavis, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp 2010) motion. He seeks an Our order from this court directing the district court to act. review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court dismissed several claims and ordered the Government to respond. Accordingly, because the district court has recently taken action in Reavis's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?