Richard Grant, Sr. v. Isec, Incorporated
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:08-cv-02791-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998435893] [10-1584]
Richard Grant, Sr. v. Isec, Incorporated
Doc. 0
Case: 10-1584 Document: 15
Date Filed: 09/30/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1584 RICHARD GRANT, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ISEC, INCORPORATED; DONALD FILINKS, Jointly and severally in his official capacity as Foreman or Superintendant; MICHAEL SAFECHUCK, Jointly and severally in his official capacity as Foreman or Superintendant, GABE SHERMAN, Jointly and severally in his official capacity as Foreman or Superintendant, RICHARD SPRINGER, Jointly and severally in his official capacity as Director of Human Resources, MICHAEL HANNEKE, Jointly and severally in his official capacity as Foreman or Superintendant; JAMES MCALLISTER, Jointly and severally in his official capacity as VicePresident of Eastern Operations; JEFFREY MORROW, Jointly and severally in his official capacity as Installation Manager; LOUIS DANIELS, Jointly and severally in his official capacity as Foreman or Superintendant, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:08-cv-02791-RDB) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-1584 Document: 15
Date Filed: 09/30/2010
Page: 2
Richard Grant, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Hammock, Bruce Stephen Harrison, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Case: 10-1584 Document: 15
Date Filed: 09/30/2010
Page: 3
PER CURIAM: Richard Grant, Sr., appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of ISEC, Inc. on his
employment discrimination claims. and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the Grant v. ISEC, Inc., No. We dispense with oral
reasons stated by the district court.
1:08-cv-02791-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 21, 2010).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?