Danny Jordan, Sr. v. Gobo, Inc.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to dismiss appeal for failure to prosecute (Local Rule 45) [998367675-2] Originating case number: 6:09-cv-00059-nkm-mfu Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998415222] [10-1589]

Download PDF
Danny Jordan, Sr. v. Gobo, Inc. Doc. 0 Case: 10-1589 Document: 10 Date Filed: 08/31/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1589 DANNY ANTONIO JORDAN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GOBO, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:09-cv-00059-nkm-mfu) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: August 31, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danny Antonio Jordan, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Ernest Falcone, PETTY, LIVINGSTON, DAWSON & RICHARDS, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-1589 Document: 10 Date Filed: 08/31/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Danny court's defendant Standards order on Antonio granting his action We have Jordan, summary brought Sr., appeals in to the favor the district of the Labor no judgment pursuant the Fair Act. reviewed record and find reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Jordan v. Gobo, Inc., No. 6:09-cv-00059In light of this disposition, by the district court. nkm-mfu (W.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2010). we deny the Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?