Danny Jordan, Sr. v. Gobo, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to dismiss appeal for failure to prosecute (Local Rule 45) [998367675-2] Originating case number: 6:09-cv-00059-nkm-mfu Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998415222] [10-1589]

Danny Jordan, Sr. v. Gobo, Inc.

Doc. 0

Case: 10-1589 Document: 10

Date Filed: 08/31/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1589 DANNY ANTONIO JORDAN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GOBO, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:09-cv-00059-nkm-mfu) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: August 31, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danny Antonio Jordan, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Ernest Falcone, PETTY, LIVINGSTON, DAWSON & RICHARDS, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-1589 Document: 10

Date Filed: 08/31/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Danny court's defendant Standards order on Antonio granting his action We have Jordan, summary brought Sr., appeals in to the favor the district of the Labor no

judgment pursuant the

Fair

Act.

reviewed

record

and

find

reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Jordan v. Gobo, Inc., No. 6:09-cv-00059In light of this disposition,

by the district court.

nkm-mfu (W.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2010).

we deny the Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process. AFFIRMED

2