Robert Hendricks v. Robert Stepp

Filing 920101230

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1590 ROBERT MASON HENDRICKS; JACQUELINE TAYLOR HENDRICKS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ROBERT STEPP, Esquire; RHONDA HUNSINGER; JEANNIE WEINGARTH; MICHAEL TAYLOR, Defendants - Appellees. MAURICE HOOD;

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:08-cv-03299-CMC) Submitted: December 10, 2010 Decided: December 30, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Mason Hendricks, Jacqueline Taylor Hendricks, Appellants Pro Se. Mark S. Barrow, William R. Calhoun, Jr., SWEENY, WINGATE & BARROW, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Katherine Dudley Helms, Christopher John Near, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Columbia, South Carolina; Janet Brooks Holmes, Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Robert Hendricks and Jacqueline Hendricks appeal the district court's order denying relief on their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to vacate the district court's July 22, 2009

dismissal of their civil action.

After reviewing the record, we

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellants' motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); MLC

Auto., LLC v. Town of S. Pines, 532 F.3d 269, 277 (4th Cir. 2008); Heyman v. M.L. Mktg. Co., 116 F.3d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1997). court. legal before Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional

would

process. AFFIRMED

2