Freddie Raynor v. Bob Rollin


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998401288-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998401288-3] Originating case number: 5:09-cv-00296-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998451997] [10-1618]

Download PDF
Freddie Raynor v. Bob Rollin Doc. 0 Case: 10-1618 Document: 15 Date Filed: 10/25/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1618 FREDDIE N. RAYNOR, Plaintiff Appellant, v. BOB ROLLINS (Wake County); DOROTHEA DIX HOSPITAL, FRED WURTERS; MONA BHATTI; Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:09-cv-00296-D) Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Freddie N. Raynor, Appellant Pro Se. Robert O. Crawford, III, CRAWFORD LAW OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Lisa Granberry Corbett, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-1618 Document: 15 Date Filed: 10/25/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Freddie N. Raynor appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in On the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Raynor's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Raynor has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we deny Raynor's motion for a stay and for appointment of counsel, and we affirm the district court's judgment. facts and legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?