Samuel Bailey v. Black Entertainment Television


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:09-cv-00787-JRS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998416202] [10-1623]

Download PDF
Samuel Bailey v. Black Entertainment Television Doc. 0 Case: 10-1623 Document: 12 Date Filed: 09/01/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1623 SAMUEL G. BAILEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, INC.; PARAMOUNT; VIACOM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00787-JRS) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel G. Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. John B. O'Keefe, LEVINE SULLIVAN KOCH & SCHULZ, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-1623 Document: 12 Date Filed: 09/01/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Samuel G. Bailey appeals the district court's order denying his copyright Inc. We complaint have against the Black record Entertainment and find no Television, reviewed reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Bailey v. Black Entm't Television, Inc., We dispense with contentions the court are and by the district court. No. 3:009-cv-00787-JRS (E.D. Va. May 3, 2010). oral argument because in the the facts and legal before adequately presented materials argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?