William Smith v. Oprah Winfrey
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:10-cv-00182-RAJ-FBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998421178] [10-1660]
<![CDATA[
William Smith v. Oprah Winfrey
Doc. 0
Case: 10-1660 Document: 14
Date Filed: 09/09/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1660 WILLIAM EARL SMITH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. OPRAH WINFREY, Defendant Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00182-RAJ-FBS) Submitted: August 18, 2010 Decided: September 9, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Earl Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-1660 Document: 14
Date Filed: 09/09/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: William Earl Smith appeals the district court's order dismissing this civil action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(h)(3) for want of jurisdiction. and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the Smith v. Winfrey, No. The motion to
reasons stated by the district court.
2:10-cv-00182-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. May 18, 2010). seal is denied. facts and legal before
We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the
materials
would
decisional process. AFFIRMED
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
