Kevin Henderson v. Howard County, Maryland

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01957-MJG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998472089] [10-1688]

Download PDF
Kevin Henderson v. Howard County, Maryland Doc. 0 Case: 10-1688 Document: 12 Date Filed: 11/24/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1688 KEVIN HENDERSON; LISA RICHARDSON HENDERSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND; OFFICER PETE, In his official and individual capacity; DETECTIVE CLATE JACKSON, In his official and individual capacity; OFFICER JOSHUA LAPIER, In his official and individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-01957-MJG) Submitted: November 18, 2010 AGEE, Circuit Decided: Judges, and November 24, 2010 HAMILTON, Senior Before SHEDD and Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Henderson, Lisa Richardson Henderson, Appellants Pro Se. Louis Paul Ruzzi, Melissa Shane Whipkey, HOWARD COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-1688 Document: 12 Date Filed: 11/24/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the We have Accordingly, court. district Henderson v. Howard County, Md, No. 1:09-cv-01957-MJG (D. Md. May 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?