Michael Darocha v. City of Salem General District

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [998390416-2]. Originating case number: 7:10-cv-00218-gec. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998416414] [10-1705]

Download PDF
Michael Darocha v. City of Salem General District Doc. 0 Case: 10-1705 Document: 6 Date Filed: 09/01/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1705 MICHAEL D. DAROCHA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF SALEM GENERAL DISTRICT COURT, Traffic Division, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:10-cv-00218-gec) Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael D. Darocha, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-1705 Document: 6 Date Filed: 09/01/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Darocha appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. On appeal, we confine our review See 4th Cir. R. to issues raised in the Appellant's brief. 34(b). basis Because Darocha's informal brief does not challenge the for the district court's disposition, Darocha has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we deny Darocha's motion to expedite and we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?