Genora Flemmings v. Verizon Wirele


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:09-cv-02220-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998449253] [10-1709]

Download PDF
Genora Flemmings v. Verizon Wirele Doc. 0 Case: 10-1709 Document: 8 Date Filed: 10/20/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1709 GENORA FLEMMINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VERIZON WIRELESS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:09-cv-02220-RBH) Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010 Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Genora Flemmings, Appellant Pro Se. William H. Floyd, NEXSEN PRUET, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. III, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-1709 Document: 8 Date Filed: 10/20/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Genora accepting granting complaint affirm. The magistrate timely filing of specific is objections to to a the Flemmings appeals of the the district court's judge order and the We recommendation motion to magistrate and Defendant's for for sanctions with dismissing orders. failure comply discovery judge's recommendation necessary preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621 (4th Cir. 2007); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). Flemmings has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?