Genora Flemmings v. Verizon Wirele

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:09-cv-02220-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998449253] [10-1709]

Genora Flemmings v. Verizon Wirele

Doc. 0

Case: 10-1709 Document: 8

Date Filed: 10/20/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1709 GENORA FLEMMINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VERIZON WIRELESS, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:09-cv-02220-RBH) Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Genora Flemmings, Appellant Pro Se. William H. Floyd, NEXSEN PRUET, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. III,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-1709 Document: 8

Date Filed: 10/20/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Genora accepting granting complaint affirm. The magistrate timely filing of specific is objections to to a the Flemmings appeals of the the district court's judge order and the We

recommendation motion to

magistrate and

Defendant's for

for

sanctions with

dismissing orders.

failure

comply

discovery

judge's

recommendation

necessary

preserve

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of

noncompliance.

United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621

(4th Cir. 2007); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). Flemmings has waived appellate review by failing to file

objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional

would

process. AFFIRMED

2