Michael Jone


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998368624-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998368623-2]; terminating Motion to expedite decision [998403307-2] Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01009-UA-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998449244] [10-1720]

Download PDF
Michael Jone Doc. 0 Case: 10-1720 Document: 7 Date Filed: 10/20/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1720 In Re: MICHAEL FORREST JONES, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:09-cv-01009-UA-LPA) Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010 Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Forrest Jones, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-1720 Document: 7 Date Filed: 10/20/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Forrest Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his civil action. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. mandamus relief is not warranted Although we find that the delay is not because unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. pauperis. legal before We grant leave to proceed in forma We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional contentions the court would process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?