Gerald Deel v. Home Depot USA, Incorporated


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:09-cv-02817-GRA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998451856] [10-1727]

Download PDF
Gerald Deel v. Home Depot USA, Incorporated Doc. 0 Case: 10-1727 Document: 16 Date Filed: 10/25/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1727 GERALD O. DEEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOME DEPOT USA, INCORPORATED; ESTES EXPRESS LINES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-02817-GRA) Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald O. Deel, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Dwight Floyd, Jr., Lawrence Michael Hershon, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Charles Edward Raynal, IV, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Thomas Lynn Ogburn, III, POYNER SPRUILL, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-1727 Document: 16 Date Filed: 10/25/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Gerald O. Deel appeals the district court's order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm for the Deel v. Home Depot USA, reasons stated by the district court. Inc., No. 7:09-cv-02817-GRA (D.S.C. filed May 26, 2010 & entered May 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?