Jeffrey Gray v. EMC Mortgage


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998394158-2] Originating case number: 8:09-cv-02768-AW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998437090] [10-1747]

Download PDF
Jeffrey Gray v. EMC Mortgage Doc. 0 Case: 10-1747 Document: 14 Date Filed: 10/01/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1747 JEFFREY K. GRAY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. EMC MORTGAGE, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-02768-AW) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey K. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Nathan Heyer, THOMPSON & HINE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-1747 Document: 14 Date Filed: 10/01/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey K. Gray appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. brief does not See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). challenge the basis Because Gray's informal the district court's for disposition, Gray has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Gray's motion to appoint counsel an dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?