Evelyn Sinkler v. MassMutual Insurance Company

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00508-CMH-TRJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998437075] [10-1785]

Download PDF
Evelyn Sinkler v. MassMutual Insurance Company Doc. 0 Case: 10-1785 Document: 17 Date Filed: 10/01/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1785 EVELYN R. SINKLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MASSMUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00508-CMH-TRJ) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Evelyn R. Sinkler, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Patrick Cunningham, Justin Sean Landreth, FUNK & BOLTON, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-1785 Document: 17 Date Filed: 10/01/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Evelyn R. Sinkler seeks to appeal the district court's order transferring this case to the District Court for the District of Maryland. over final orders, This court may exercise jurisdiction only 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). is neither a final order The order Sinkler seeks to appeal an appealable interlocutory or nor collateral order. of jurisdiction. facts and legal before Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack We dispense with oral argument because the contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials would decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?