Reverend Reaves v. City of Mullin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:07-cv-01487-TLW-TER Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998559411]. Mailed to: Amanda Evans, Donald Reaves, Franklin Reaves, Freddy Reaves, Henry Reaves, Hercules Reaves, Valeria Reaves, Vastena Reaves. [10-1806, 10-1973]

Download PDF
Case: 10-1806 Document: 42 Date Filed: 04/04/2011 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1806 REVEREND FRANKLIN C. REAVES, PhD; VASTENA REAVES; DONALD N. REAVES; HENRY O. REAVES; AMANDA EVANS; VALERIA REAVES MARTIN; HERCULES W. REAVES; FREDDY L. REAVES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and KATHY J. REAVES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MULLINS; MARION COUNTY; W. KENNETH MCDONALD, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor; TERRY B. STRICKLAND, individually and in his official capacity as member of Mullins City Council; JO A. SANDERS, individually and in her official capacity as member of Mullins City Council; JAMES W. ARMSTRONG, individually and in his official capacity as member of Mullins City Council; PATRICIA A. PHILLIPS, individually and in her official capacity as member of Mullins City Council; D. WAYNE COLLINS, individually and in his official capacity as member of Mullins City Council; DANIEL B. SHELLEY, JR.; GEORGE HARDWICK, individually and in his official capacity as City Administrator for City of Mullins; EDWIN P. ROGERS, individually and in his official capacity as Marion County Administrator; K. DONALD FLING, individually and in his official capacity as Marion County Code Enforcement Officer; JOHN Q. ATKINSON, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; ELOISE W. ROGERS, individually and in her official capacity as member of Marion County Council; TOM SHAW, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; ALLEN FLOYD, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; MILTON TROY, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; Case: 10-1806 Document: 42 Date Filed: 04/04/2011 Page: 2 PEARLY BRITT, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County; ELISTA H. SMITH, individually and in her official capacity as member of Marion County Council; CITY OF MULLINS POLICE DEPARTMENT; RUSSELL BASS, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of City of Mullins Police Department; VICKIE NICHOLS, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants – Appellees, and STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant. No. 10-1973 REVEREND FRANKLIN C. REAVES, PhD; VASTENA REAVES; DONALD N. REAVES; HENRY O. REAVES; AMANDA EVANS; VALERIA REAVES MARTIN; HERCULES W. REAVES; FREDDY L. REAVES, Plaintiffs – Appellants, and KATHY J. REAVES, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MULLINS; MARION COUNTY; W. KENNETH MCDONALD, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor; TERRY B. STRICKLAND, individually and in his official capacity as member of Mullins City Council; JO A. SANDERS, individually and in her official capacity as member of Mullins City Council; JAMES W. ARMSTRONG, individually and in his official capacity as member of Mullins City Council; PATRICIA A. PHILLIPS, individually and in her official capacity as member of Mullins City Council; D. WAYNE COLLINS, individually and in his official capacity as member of Mullins City Council; DANIEL B. SHELLEY, JR.; GEORGE HARDWICK, individually and in his official capacity as City 2 Case: 10-1806 Document: 42 Date Filed: 04/04/2011 Page: 3 Administrator for City of Mullins; EDWIN P. ROGERS, individually and in his official capacity as Marion County Administrator; K. DONALD FLING, individually and in his official capacity as Marion County Code Enforcement Officer; JOHN Q. ATKINSON, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; ELOISE W. ROGERS, individually and in her official capacity as member of Marion County Council; TOM SHAW, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; ALLEN FLOYD, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; MILTON TROY, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County Council; PEARLY BRITT, individually and in his official capacity as member of Marion County; ELISTA H. SMITH, individually and in her official capacity as member of Marion County Council; CITY OF MULLINS POLICE DEPARTMENT; RUSSELL BASS, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of City of Mullins Police Department; VICKIE NICHOLS, individually and in her official capacity, Defendants – Appellees, and STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:07-cv-01487-TLW-TER) Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Franklin C. Reaves, Vastena Reaves, Donald N. Reaves, Henry O. Reaves, Amanda Evans, Valeria Reaves Martin, Hercules W. Reaves, and Freddy L. Reaves, Appellants Pro Se. Douglas Charles 3 Case: 10-1806 Document: 42 Date Filed: 04/04/2011 Page: 4 Baxter, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; Robert Thomas King, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 4 Case: 10-1806 Document: 42 Date Filed: 04/04/2011 Page: 5 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Appellants appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on their civil action and denying their subsequent reconsideration. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for Appellants also appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to reconsider the order granting sanctions to Appellees. In their informal briefs, Appellants fail to address the dispositive issues in the case. Therefore, Appellants have forfeited appellate review of those issues. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (limiting review to issues raised informal in the Goldsboro, 178 F.3d brief); 231, 241 see n.6 also (4th Edwards Cir. v. 1999) City of (finding failure to raise issue in opening brief constituted abandonment of that issue). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?