Patricia Patterson v. George Funderburk

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for default judgment [998430442-2] Originating case number: 0:10-cv-00676-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998441308] [10-1859]

Patricia Patterson v. George Funderburk

Doc. 0

Case: 10-1859 Document: 11

Date Filed: 10/07/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1859 PATRICIA T. PATTERSON, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. GEORGE FUNDERBURK; SUSAN BARDEN; DAVID HUFFSTERTLER, Defendants ­ Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (0:10-cv-00676-MBS) Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 7, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia T. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-1859 Document: 11

Date Filed: 10/07/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Patricia T. Patterson appeals the district court's

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. June Patterson v. Funderburk, No. 0:10-cv-00676-MBS (D.S.C. 10, 2010). We deny Patterson's motion for default

judgment. legal before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional

contentions the court

would

process. AFFIRMED

2