Patricia Patterson v. James Barber, III

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:10-cv-00025-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998441327] [10-1861]

Download PDF
Patricia Patterson v. James Barber, III Doc. 0 Case: 10-1861 Document: 12 Date Filed: 10/07/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1861 PATRICIA T. PATTERSON, Plaintiff Appellant, v. JAMES R. BARBER, III; GEORGE FUNDERBURK; SUSAN BARDEN; DAVID HUFFSTERTLER, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (0:10-cv-00025-MBS) Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 7, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia T. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-1861 Document: 12 Date Filed: 10/07/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Patricia T. Patterson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. June 10, facts Patterson v. 2010). legal before We Barber, dispense No. with are and 0:10-cv-00025-MBS oral argument (D.S.C. the the the because in aid and contentions the court adequately argument presented not materials would decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?