Patricia Patterson v. James Barber, III

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:10-cv-00025-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998441327] [10-1861]

Patricia Patterson v. James Barber, III

Doc. 0

Case: 10-1861 Document: 12

Date Filed: 10/07/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1861 PATRICIA T. PATTERSON, Plaintiff ­ Appellant, v. JAMES R. BARBER, III; GEORGE FUNDERBURK; SUSAN BARDEN; DAVID HUFFSTERTLER, Defendants ­ Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (0:10-cv-00025-MBS) Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 7, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia T. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-1861 Document: 12

Date Filed: 10/07/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Patricia T. Patterson appeals the district court's

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. June 10, facts Patterson v. 2010). legal before We Barber, dispense No. with are and 0:10-cv-00025-MBS oral argument (D.S.C. the the the

because in aid

and

contentions the court

adequately argument

presented not

materials

would

decisional process. AFFIRMED

2