Mark Damron

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998405647-2]; denying Motion for other relief [998390959-3]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998390959-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998390951-2] Originating case number: 3:09-cv-00098 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998437144] [10-1867]

Mark Damron

Doc. 0

Case: 10-1867 Document: 8

Date Filed: 10/01/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1867

In re:

MARK DAMRON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. (3:09-cv-00098) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Damron, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-1867 Document: 8

Date Filed: 10/01/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Mark Damron petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on certain motions in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition for a writ of habeas corpus proceeding. He seeks an order from this court directing Our review of the district court's

the district court to act.

docket reveals that the district court denied his motions and dismissed his § 2254 case. Accordingly, because the district

court has recently decided Damron's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We deny Damron's We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. motions for appointment of counsel and for

evidentiary hearing. facts and legal before

We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the

contentions the court

materials

would

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2