Mildred Knight v. Episcopal Church of the US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:10-cv-00516-DCN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998472093] [10-1947]
<![CDATA[
Case: 10-1947 Document: 12
Date Filed: 11/24/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1947 MILDRED C. KNIGHT; BOBBY KNIGHT, III, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE UNITED STATES; BISHOP KATHARINE JEFFERTS SCHORI; EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF LOWER SOUTH CAROLINA; REVEREND MARK J. LAWRENCE; EPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME; FAMILY SERVICES INCORPORATED; IRIS ALBRIGHT; IRVIN CONDON; WALTER KAUFFMAN; GLENN CHURCHILL; JOHN DOES; JANE DOES; LINDA K. JONES; C. CHLOE; FREDERICK R. TONNEY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00516-DCN) Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: November 24, 2010
Before AGEE, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. * Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mildred C. Knight, Bobby Knight, III, Appellants Pro Se.
*
§ 46(d)
The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Case: 10-1947 Document: 12
Date Filed: 11/24/2010
Page: 2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Case: 10-1947 Document: 12
Date Filed: 11/24/2010
Page: 3
PER CURIAM: Mildred C. Knight and Bobby Knight, III, appeal the district court's orders denying their motion to reconsider the order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissing their purported civil rights action for lack of jurisdiction. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated Knight v. Episcopal Church of the United
by the district court.
States, No. 2:10-cv-00516-DCN (D.S.C. July 26, 2010 & Aug. 10, 2010). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
would
process. AFFIRMED
3
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
