Arthur Field v. Henry McMaster

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [998419340-2] Originating case number: 6:09-cv-01949-HMH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998449554] [10-1957]

Arthur Field v. Henry McMaster

Doc. 0

Case: 10-1957 Document: 31

Date Filed: 10/20/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1957 ARTHUR M. FIELD, PhD.; KATHRYN TAILLON; T. BART KELLEY, Plaintiffs ­ Appellants, and CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUNDING LLC, Jerry T. Saad, Receiver for Capital Investment Funding LLC, Plaintiff, v. HENRY D. MCMASTER, Individually and as Securities Commissioner of South Carolina; WILLIAM JOSEPH CONDON, JR., Individually and as Assistant Securities Commissioner; TOMMY WINDSOR, Individually and as Securities Investigator; JOE F. JORDAN, JR., Individually and as an Investigator of the Attorney General; JENNIFER EVANS, as personal representative; LANSING LOGAN, Individually and as a Special Investigator of the Attorney General; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, State of South Carolina, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:09-cv-01949-HMH) Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-1957 Document: 31

Date Filed: 10/20/2010

Page: 2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur M. Field, Kathryn Taillon, T. Bart Kelley, Appellants Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Kenneth Paul Woodington, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Evan Markus Gessner, Michael Stephen Pauley, LIDE & PAULEY, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Case: 10-1957 Document: 31

Date Filed: 10/20/2010

Page: 3

PER CURIAM: Arthur M. Field, Kathryn Taillon, and T. Bart Kelley appeal the district court's order adopting in part the

magistrate judge's recommendation and granting summary judgment in favor of several state employees in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny the Appellants' motion

to file a state transcript as an attachment to their informal brief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Field v. McMaster, No. 6:09-cv-01949-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3