First Baptist Church of Glenar v. New Market Metalcraft, Inc
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:10-cv-00543-AW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998651558].. [10-1991]
Appeal: 10-1991
Document: 37
Date Filed: 08/10/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1991
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF GLENARDEN,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
NEW MARKET METALCRAFT, INCORPORATED, a Virginia corporation,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:10-cv-00543-AW)
Submitted:
July 28, 2011
Decided:
August 10, 2011
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Melkersen, THE LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL J. MELKERSEN,
New Market, Virginia, for Appellant. Susan M. Euteneuer, DUANE
MORRIS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Daniel E. Toomey, DUANE
MORRIS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 10-1991
Document: 37
Date Filed: 08/10/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
New
court’s
Market
order
Metalcraft,
granting
First
Inc.,
Baptist
motion to confirm an arbitration award.
appeals
Church
the
of
district
Glenarden’s
We have reviewed the
record included on appeal, as well as the briefs filed by the
parties,
and
find
no
error
in
the
district
court’s
ruling.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
First
Baptist
Church
of
Glenarden
v.
New
Market
Metalcraft, Inc., No. 8:10-cv-00543-AW (D. Md. July 30, 2010).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?