Michael Weldetensaye v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A098 395 394 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998586268].. [10-2042]

Download PDF
Appeal: 10-2042 Document: 34 Date Filed: 05/10/2011 Page: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2042 MICHAEL ZEFERU WELDETENSAYE, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: May 4, 2011 Decided: May 10, 2011 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Allen Garfield, GARFIELD LAW GROUP LLP, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer Levings, Senior Litigation Counsel, Kristen Giuffreda Chapman, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 10-2042 Document: 34 Date Filed: 05/10/2011 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Zeferu Weldetensaye, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2010); Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009) (setting forth standard of review). We therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Aug. 16, 2010). facts and materials legal before See In re: Weldetensaye (B.I.A. We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?