Michael Weldetensaye v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A098 395 394 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998586268].. [10-2042]
Appeal: 10-2042
Document: 34
Date Filed: 05/10/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2042
MICHAEL ZEFERU WELDETENSAYE,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted:
May 4, 2011
Decided:
May 10, 2011
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Allen Garfield, GARFIELD LAW GROUP LLP, Washington, D.C.,
for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer
Levings, Senior Litigation Counsel, Kristen Giuffreda Chapman,
Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 10-2042
Document: 34
Date Filed: 05/10/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Zeferu Weldetensaye, a native and citizen of
Ethiopia,
petitions
for
review
of
an
order
of
the
Board
of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider.
We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order
and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying
the motion.
See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2010); Narine v. Holder,
559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009) (setting forth standard of
review).
We therefore deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board.
Aug. 16, 2010).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
See In re: Weldetensaye (B.I.A.
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
the
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?