In re: Richard Brillhart
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998451155-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998450863-2] Originating case number: Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998652613]. Mailed to: Richard Brillhart. [10-2192]
<![CDATA[
Appeal: 10-2192
Document: 11
Date Filed: 08/11/2011
Page: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2192
In Re:
RICHARD EDWARD BRILLHART,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted:
July 29, 2011
Decided:
August 11, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Edward Brillhart, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 10-2192
Document: 11
Date Filed: 08/11/2011
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Richard
Edward
Brillhart
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus, alleging that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is
deducting more than twenty percent of his trust account balance
for payment of filing fees, in violation of Torres v. O’Quinn,
612 F.3d 237 (4th Cir. 2010).
He seeks an order from this court
Our review of district
directing the BOP to comply with Torres.
court records confirms that the BOP is now in compliance with
Torres.
forma
Accordingly,
pauperis,
dispense
with
we
oral
although
deny
the
argument
we
grant
mandamus
because
leave
to
proceed
in
petition
as
moot.
We
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
