Jacqueline Carroll-Hall v. The Arc of Baltimore

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00873-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998591934].. [10-2200]

Appeal: 10-2200

Document: 11

Date Filed: 05/18/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2200

JACQUELINE R. CARROLL-HALL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THE ARC OF BALTIMORE; RON CHRISTIAN; DELE SANGODEYI;
MONIQUE DUBOIS; SHAREEN JONES; KEVIN PUSHIA; CHRYSTIE
NICHOLSON; KIM MEEKINS; RYAN REIF; OLU FATODU; ALAN
CAMPBELL,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-00873-RDB)

Submitted:

April 29, 2011

Decided:

May 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacqueline R. Carroll-Hall, Appellant Pro Se. David
Jacobson, BLADES & ROSENFELD, PA, Baltimore, Maryland,
Appellees.

Lee
for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-2200

Document: 11

Date Filed: 05/18/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline
court’s

order

R.

granting

Carroll-Hall
Defendants’

appeals
motion

the

to

district

dismiss

her

complaint alleging claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West
2003

&

Supp.

2010),

and

under

the

Age

Discrimination

in

Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634
(West 2008 & Supp. 2010).
no reversible error.
stated

by

the

We have reviewed the record and find

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

district

court.

Carroll-Hall

v.

The

Arc

Baltimore, No. 1:10-cv-00873-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 22, 2010).
dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

of
We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2