Kenneth Liggins v. Robina Bouffault
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998594210].. [10-2239, 11-1083]
Appeal: 10-2239
Document: 16
Date Filed: 05/20/2011
Page: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2239
KENNETH D. LIGGINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,
Defendants – Appellees.
No. 11-1083
KENNETH D. LIGGINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc)
Submitted:
May 3, 2011
Decided:
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
May 20, 2011
Appeal: 10-2239
Document: 16
Date Filed: 05/20/2011
Page: 2 of 3
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se.
Stacy Leann Haney, REED
SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 10-2239
Document: 16
Date Filed: 05/20/2011
Page: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for a new trial, entering final judgment on
the
jury
verdict,
and
government expense.
reversible error.
legal
before
motion
for
transcripts
at
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
See Liggins v. Clarke County School Bd.,
5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc
2010).
his
We have reviewed the record and find no
by the district court.
No.
denying
(W.D.
Va.
Oct.
28,
2010;
Dec.
6,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?