Kenneth Liggins v. Robina Bouffault

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998594210].. [10-2239, 11-1083]

Download PDF
Appeal: 10-2239 Document: 16 Date Filed: 05/20/2011 Page: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2239 KENNETH D. LIGGINS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendants – Appellees. No. 11-1083 KENNETH D. LIGGINS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendants – Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc) Submitted: May 3, 2011 Decided: Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. May 20, 2011 Appeal: 10-2239 Document: 16 Date Filed: 05/20/2011 Page: 2 of 3 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se. Stacy Leann Haney, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 10-2239 Document: 16 Date Filed: 05/20/2011 Page: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a new trial, entering final judgment on the jury verdict, and government expense. reversible error. legal before motion for transcripts at Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated See Liggins v. Clarke County School Bd., 5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc 2010). his We have reviewed the record and find no by the district court. No. denying (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2010; Dec. 6, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?