In re: Vincent Missouri
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998489401-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) as moot [998466573-2]. Originating case number: 6:00-cr-00498-MBS-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998559318]. Mailed to: Vincent Missouri, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY - BIG SANDY, P. O. Box 2068, Inez, KY 41224-0000. [10-2247]
Case: 10-2247
Document: 11
Date Filed: 04/04/2011
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2247
In Re:
VINCENT MISSOURI,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:00-cr-00498-MBS-1)
Submitted:
March 31, 2011
Decided:
April 4, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent Missouri, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Case: 10-2247
Document: 11
Date Filed: 04/04/2011
Page: 2
PER CURIAM:
Vincent
Missouri
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus,
challenging the validity of the sentence imposed by the district
court upon revoking his supervised release.
He sought an order
from this court correcting the judgment imposed by the district
court.
on
Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that
February
judgment
22,
2011,
reducing
the
district
Missouri’s
court
sentence.
entered
Because
an
the
amended
district
court has corrected the error Missouri seeks to challenge in
this
mandamus
petition,
the
petition
is
moot.
Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny
the mandamus petition as moot.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?