In re: Vincent Missouri

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998489401-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) as moot [998466573-2]. Originating case number: 6:00-cr-00498-MBS-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998559318]. Mailed to: Vincent Missouri, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY - BIG SANDY, P. O. Box 2068, Inez, KY 41224-0000. [10-2247]

Download PDF
Case: 10-2247 Document: 11 Date Filed: 04/04/2011 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2247 In Re: VINCENT MISSOURI, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:00-cr-00498-MBS-1) Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vincent Missouri, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-2247 Document: 11 Date Filed: 04/04/2011 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Vincent Missouri petitions for a writ of mandamus, challenging the validity of the sentence imposed by the district court upon revoking his supervised release. He sought an order from this court correcting the judgment imposed by the district court. on Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that February judgment 22, 2011, reducing the district Missouri’s court sentence. entered Because an the amended district court has corrected the error Missouri seeks to challenge in this mandamus petition, the petition is moot. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?