Lavon Pressley v. Caromont Health Incorporated


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:09-cv-00460-FDW-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998537674] [10-2272]

Download PDF
Lavon Pressley v. Caromont Health Incorporated Doc. 0 Case: 10-2272 Document: 17 Date Filed: 03/04/2011 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2272 LAVON S. PRESSLEY, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CAROMONT HEALTH INCORPORATED; CAROMONT HEALTHCARE SERVICES INCORPORATED; GASTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:09-cv-00460-FDW-DSC) Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 4, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lavon S. Pressley, Appellant Pro Se. Marylin Elizabeth Culp, LITTLER MENDELSON, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-2272 Document: 17 Date Filed: 03/04/2011 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Lavon S. Pressley appeals the district court's order granting Hospital, the Caromont motion Health, for Inc., and Gaston and Memorial denying Inc.'s summary judgment Pressley's motion for summary judgment. * record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for Pressley v. Caromont (W.D.N.C. (Nov. 3, the reasons stated by the district court. Health, 2010). legal before Inc., No. 3:09-cv-00460-FDW-DSC We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. AFFIRMED The district court, in the same order, dismissed Caromont Healthcare Services, Inc., on the ground that it is not a legal entity. Pressley does not contest this ruling on appeal. * 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?