Merle Rutledge, Jr. v. Officer Roach

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:10-cv-00035-JLK-MFU Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998537696] [10-2310]

Download PDF
Merle Rutledge, Jr. v. Officer Roach Doc. 0 Case: 10-2310 Document: 8 Date Filed: 03/04/2011 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2310 MERLE T. RUTLEDGE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER ROACH OF THE CHATHAM, VA POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant Appellee, and TOWN OF CHATHAM, VIRGINIA; CHATHAM, VA POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF MARTIN WRIGHT OF THE CHATHAM, VA POLICE DEPARTMENT; PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA BOB MCDONNELL; VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II; THE HONORABLE GOVERNOR OF ARIZONA JAN BREWER; ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL TERRY GODDARD; STATE OF VIRGINIA; CITY OF DANVILLE, VA; CITY OF DANVILLE, VA POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:10-cv-00035-JLK-MFU) Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 4, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-2310 Document: 8 Date Filed: 03/04/2011 Page: 2 Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Martha White Medley, Michael Anthony Nicholas, DANIEL, MEDLEY & KIRBY, PC, Danville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Case: 10-2310 Document: 8 Date Filed: 03/04/2011 Page: 3 PER CURIAM: Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion to amend his complaint. record and find no reversible error. the reasons stated by the district We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for court. See Rutledge v. Roach, No. 4:10-cv-00035-JLK-MFU (W.D. Va. Sept. 30 & Nov. 18, 2010). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional would process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?