William Taccino v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-02994-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998605402]. Mailed to: appellants. [10-2346]

Appeal: 10-2346

Document: 19

Date Filed: 06/06/2011

Page: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2346

WILLIAM A. TACCINO; MARLENE M. TACCINO,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
LITTON
LOAN
SERVICING,
LP;
LASALLE
BANK
NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION; LARRY D. RICHMAN, CEO; KENNETH J. MACFADYEN,
a/k/a Kenneth J. MacFayden; MIRIAM S. FUCHS, a/k/a Marion
Fuchs,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:09-cv-02994-RDB)

Submitted:

May 24, 2011

Before KING and
Circuit Judge.

SHEDD,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

and

June 6, 2011

HAMILTON,

Senior

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William A. Taccino, Marlene M. Taccino, Appellants Pro Se.
Daniel J. Tobin, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland; Michael
Thomas Cantrell, FRIEDMAN & MACFADYEN, PC, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-2346

Document: 19

Date Filed: 06/06/2011

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William

A.

Taccino

and

Marlene

M.

Taccino

seek

to

appeal the district court’s order granting motions to dismiss
filed by Defendants LaSalle Bank National Association, Larry D.
Richman

and

Kenneth

J.

MacFadyen.

This

court

may

exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
and

certain

interlocutory

and

collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan

Corp.,

Taccinos’

337

seek

U.S.

to

541,

appeal

545-46

is

(1949).

neither

a

The

final

order

order

nor

the
an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as it disposes of
fewer

than

all

Accordingly,

of

the

because

parties

this

matter

involved

in

remains

this

lawsuit.

pending

against

Defendants Litton Loan Servicing, LP, and Miriam S. Fuchs, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with
contentions
the

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2