US v. Darryl Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:08-cr-00930-DCN-7. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998831194].. [10-4941]

Appeal: 10-4941

Document: 59

Date Filed: 04/12/2012

Page: 1 of 5

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-4941

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRYL LEE JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District
Judge. (2:08-cr-00930-DCN-7)

Submitted:

March 16, 2012

Before MOTZ and
Circuit Judge.

SHEDD,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

and

April 12, 2012

HAMILTON,

Senior

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

N. Elliott Barnwell, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant.
William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, Peter T. Phillips, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 10-4941

Document: 59

Date Filed: 04/12/2012

Page: 2 of 5

PER CURIAM:
Darryl Lee Johnson pled guilty to conspiracy to possess
with intent to distribute and to distribute a quantity of heroin
and three counts of possession with intent to distribute and
distribution
concluded

of

that

a

quantity

Johnson

of

heroin.

qualified

as

a

The

district

court

Career

Offender

under

United States Sentencing Guideline (USSG) § 4B1.1 and imposed a
sentence

of

challenges

151
his

months’

imprisonment.

sentence.

As

On

explained

appeal,

below,

we

Johnson
vacate

Johnson’s sentence and remand for further proceedings consistent
with this opinion.
To qualify as a Career Offender under USSG § 4B1.1, inter
alia,

a

defendant

convictions

of

must

either

substance offense.”

a

have

“at

least

crime

of

violence

USSG § 4B1.1(a).

two
or

prior
a

felony

controlled

Johnson did not dispute

below and does not dispute on appeal that his 2004 conviction,
pursuant to a guilty plea in South Carolina state court, for
possession with intent to distribute marijuana qualifies as a
prior felony conviction for a controlled substance offense under
USSG

§ 4B1.1(a).

However,

Johnson

challenged

below

and

continues to challenge on appeal the district court’s conclusion
that his 2008 conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea in South
Carolina state court, for assault and battery of a high and
aggravated

nature

(ABHAN)

under
- 2 -

South

Carolina’s

common

law

Appeal: 10-4941

Document: 59

Date Filed: 04/12/2012

Page: 3 of 5

constitutes a “crime of violence” under USSG § 4B1.1(a).

This

is the sole issue on appeal.
A “crime of violence” is defined by the Guidelines as an
offense that is punishable by imprisonment for more than one
year and “(1) has as an element the use, attempted use, or
threatened use of physical force against the person of another,
or (2) is burglary of a dwelling, arson, or extortion, involves
use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a
serious potential risk of physical injury to another.”
§ 4B1.2(a).
a

crime

USSG

In deciding whether a prior conviction qualifies as

of

violence

under

the

Guidelines’

Career

Offender

provision, the sentencing court normally employs a categorical
approach.

United States v. Peterson, 629 F.3d 432, 435 (4th

Cir. 2011).

Under this approach, the district court considers

the

as

offense

defined

by

the

relevant

law,

rather

than

considering the facts of the underlying specific crime.
v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2267, 2272 (2011).
to

constitute

a

‘crime

of

approach,

the

offense’s

including

the

least

within

the

applicable

violence’

full

culpable

range

under
of

proscribed

Guidelines

“For an offense

th[e

categorical]

proscribed
conduct,

definition

Sykes

of

conduct,
must

that

fall

term.”

United States v. King, 2012 WL 745535, at *2 (4th Cir. March 8,
2012).
includes

However, if the offense as defined by the relevant law
conduct

such

that

some
- 3 -

commissions

of

the

offense

Appeal: 10-4941

Document: 59

Date Filed: 04/12/2012

Page: 4 of 5

constitute crimes of violence and others do not, “we look beyond
the

generic

elements

of

the

offense

underlying that prior offense.”

to

the

specific

Id. at *3.

the modified categorical approach.

conduct

This is known as

In applying the modified

categorical approach to a prior conviction based upon a guilty
plea such is at issue here, the sentencing court is limited to
considering

“the

record

of

conviction,

which

includes

the

charging document, the plea agreement, and the transcript of the
plea colloquy, and any explicit factual findings made by the
trial court.”
Here,
court

Id.

employing

concluded

the

that

categorical

South

Carolina’s

approach,
common

the

law

district

offense

of

ABHAN constitutes a crime of violence under USSG § 4B1.1(a).
Having so concluded, the district court did not go on to analyze
the conviction under the modified categorical approach.
expressing

an

opinion

on

whether

the

offense

of

Without

ABHAN

under

South Carolina’s common law categorically constitutes a crime of
violence

under

USSG

§ 4B1.1(a),

we

have

decided

the

prudent

course under the circumstances is to vacate Johnson’s sentence
and

remand

this

case

to

the

district

court

for

further

proceedings in order to allow the district court to determine if
the modified categorical approach supports the conclusion that
Johnson’s conviction for ABHAN under South Carolina common law
constitutes

a

crime

of

violence
- 4 -

under

USSG

§ 4B1.1(a).

See

Appeal: 10-4941

Document: 59

Date Filed: 04/12/2012

Page: 5 of 5

Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 218 (1974) (“We think
it inadvisable . . . to reach out . . . to pass on important
questions

of

statutory

construction

when

simpler,

and

more

settled, grounds are available for deciding the case at hand.”).
On this issue, the district court should permit the parties to
present evidence.
to

present

guilty

plea

a

For example, the government is free on remand

transcript
hearing

with

of

the

plea

respect

to

colloquy
his

2008

from

Johnson’s

conviction

for

ABHAN under South Carolina’s common law.
Based on the foregoing, we vacate Johnson’s sentence and
remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
dispense

with

oral

argument

because

the

facts

and

We

legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

- 5 -