US v. Alexander McKenzie
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. ALEXANDER SHERMAN MCKENZIE, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:97-cr-00203-MR-1)
February 25, 2010
March 5, 2010
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Sherman McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Alexander Sherman McKenzie appeals the district
court's order denying his motion for relief from his criminal judgment, his motion for appointment of counsel, and U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) We (2006) have motion the to modify and his 18 term find of no
imprisonment. reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated United States v. McKenzie, No. 1:97-cr10, 2009). We dispense with oral
by the district court. 00203-MR-1 (W.D.N.C.
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?