David Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DAVID L. REYNOLDS, Petitioner Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, Respondent Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ)
March 30, 2010
April 29, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David L. Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: David L. Reynolds appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). error. We have reviewed the record we and find leave no to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. Supreme Court of Virginia, No. Additionally,
1:09-cv-01079-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2009).
we deny as unnecessary Reynolds' motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?