Paul Scinto, Sr. v. Edward Preston

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to exceed length limitations [998269546-2] Originating case number: 4:03-cv-00178-H Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998401694] [10-6058]

Paul Scinto, Sr. v. Edward Preston

Doc. 0

Case: 10-6058 Document: 19

Date Filed: 08/12/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6058 PAUL SCINTO, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD GLENN PRESTON; RALPH MELTON, JR.; FRANK POLUMBO; ERIC WING; THE CITY OF NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA; ESTATE OF BRIAN LEMAY, Defendants ­ Appellees, and E&J AUTOMOTIVE, et al.; BRIAN LEMAY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cv-00178-H) Submitted: July 20, 2010 Decided: August 12, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Scinto, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James Carlton Thornton, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; W. Walton Kitchin, Jr., COLOMBO, KITCHIN, JOHNSON, DUNN & BALL, LLP, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-6058 Document: 19 PER CURIAM:

Date Filed: 08/12/2010

Page: 2

Paul Scinto, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scinto v. Preston, No. 4:03-cv-00178-H (E.D.N.C. May 28 We grant Scinto's motion to exceed length informal brief. We dispense with oral

& Dec. 11, 2009). limitations for his

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

2