Warren Chase v. The Prior and Present DOC Comm

Filing 402749135

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [998274071-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cv-00834-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998315893] [10-6094]

Case: 10-6094

Document: 13

Date Filed: 04/09/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6094 WARREN CHASE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE PRIOR AND PRESENT DOC COMMISSIONERS OF CORRECTIONS; KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden; SIMON WAINWRIGHT, Warden; TYRONE CROWDER; JOHN S. WOLFE; CALVIN WILSON; PATRICIA SHEARIN, Warden; D. HANSEN, Major; C. N. PEAY, Major; J. MAYFIELD, Lieutenant; T. DONNELL, Lieutenant; R. WALKER, Lieutenant; J. E. PRICE, Sergeant; M. MONTGOMERY, Sergeant; T. MARTIN, Sergeant; T. SMITH; T. BRAWNER, Sergeant; T. BROWN, Sergeant; D. MAYZCK, Sergeant; R. THOMPSON, Sergeant; S. FLOID; D. WIGGINS, Sergeant; K. COOPER, Sergeant; T. RICHARDSON, Sergeant; H. TALIB, Sergeant; M. WINN, Sergeant; E. THOMPSON, Sergeant; S. PHILLIPS, Sergeant; A. SCOTT, Sergeant; D. GREEN, Sergeant; E. PULLEY, Sergeant; D. MANGUM, Sergeant; M. ROSS, Sergeant; D. OLIVER, Sergeant; D. CHASE, Sergeant; D. ALEXANDER, Sergeant; L. BATTLE, Sergeant; F. SMITH, Sergeant; B. STOLKS, Sergeant; J. A. BAILEY, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00834-CCB) Submitted: March 29, 2010 Decided: April 9, 2010

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Case: 10-6094

Document: 13

Date Filed: 04/09/2010

Page: 2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Case: 10-6094

Document: 13

Date Filed: 04/09/2010

Page: 3

PER CURIAM: Warren Chase appeals the district court's order We

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.

Accordingly, we deny Chase's motion for injunctive relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Chase v. The Prior and Present DOC Commissioners, No. 1:08-cv00834-CCB (D. Md. Dec. 2, 2009). We note Chase failed to

indicate in his complaint that any specific Defendant acted with deliberate indifference to his serious needs. See Smith v.

Ozmint, 578 F.3d 246, 255 (4th Cir. 2009). oral argument because in the the facts and legal

We dispense with contentions the court are and

adequately

presented

materials

before

argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

3