Stacy Howard v. Jon Ozmint

Filing

OPINION/ORDER DIRECTING LIMITED REMAND filed by DGM, PVN and RBK [4CCA retains jurisdiction]. Originating case number: 6:08-cv-03171-GRA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998453767] [10-6106]

Download PDF
Stacy Howard v. Jon Ozmint Doc. 0 Case: 10-6106 Document: 27 Date Filed: 10/27/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6106 STACY W. HOWARD, Plaintiff Appellant, v. DIRECTOR JON E. OZMINT, of S.C. Department of Corrections also known as John E. Ozmint; WARDEN WILLIE EAGLETON; AARON JOYNER, Major; CAPTAIN KENNETH GREEN; S. SKIPPER, IGC of the Evans Correctional Institution; T. WOOLBRIGHT; S. MOSES; C. FOX; T. SIMMONS; MICHAEL J. STOBBE, Inmate Records; JIMMY EDGE, officer; DAVID BRAYBOY, officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:08-cv-03171-GRA) Submitted: August 31, 2010 Decided: October 27, 2010 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stacy W. Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Leigh Powers Boan, William Walter Doar, Jr., MCNAIR LAW FIRM, PA, Pawleys Island, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-6106 Document: 27 Date Filed: 10/27/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Stacy W. Howard seeks to appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants. appeal was received of the in the district period. court The notice of shortly after is expiration appeal Because Howard incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. (1988). of Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 The record does not reveal when Howard gave the notice to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we appeal remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. REMANDED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?