US v. Tyrone Noble

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:06-cr-00748-JFA-9. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998471220] [10-6125]

US v. Tyrone Noble

Doc. 0

Case: 10-6125 Document: 14

Date Filed: 11/23/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6125 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE NOBLE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:06-cr-00748-JFA-9) Submitted: October 26, 2010 Decided: November 23, 2010

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Noble, Appellant Pro Se. Julius Ness Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case: 10-6125 Document: 14

Date Filed: 11/23/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Tyrone Noble appeals from the district court's orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of

sentence and his motion for reconsideration.

We have reviewed

the record and the arguments of the parties, and we affirm the denial of Noble's § 3582 motion for the reasons stated by the district court. (D.S.C. Dec. United States v. Noble, No. 3:06-cr-00748-JFA-9 2, 2009). Regarding Noble's motion for

reconsideration, although we affirm the district court's denial of the motion, we conclude that the district court had no

jurisdiction to consider Noble's motion.

See United States v.

Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process. AFFIRMED

2