US v. Vernell Randolph
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. VERNELL BROWN RANDOLPH, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:04-cr-00024-JBF-TEM-1)
May 20, 2010
May 27, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vernell Brown Randolph, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Vernell order denying Brown Randolph on her appeals the district for court's of We
sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (E.D. United States v. Randolph, No. 4:04-cr-00024-JBF-TEM-1 Va. Jan. 6, 2010). We deny Randolph's motion for
appointment of counsel.
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?