US v. Johnny Gore
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOHNNY LEE GORE, a/k/a Manager, Defendant Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:01-cr-00627-CWH-9)
May 20, 2010
May 27, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Lee Gore, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Johnny Lee Gore appeals the district court's order
denying his motion for a new trial filed under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, because the motion was
untimely. after the
We agree. verdict or
Under Rule 33(b)(1), Gore had "3 years finding of guilty" to file his motion
claiming he had newly discovered evidence.
See Fed. R. Crim. P. Because
33(b)(1). The jury found Gore guilty on June 5, 2002.
Gore did not file his Rule 33 motion until September 23, 2009, the motion was not timely. court's denial of relief. Accordingly, we affirm the district We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?