Joseph Widemon v. Guilford County District Attor

Filing 920100527

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6180

JOSEPH WIDEMON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GUILFORD COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, OVER DISTRICT #18; GUILFORD COUNTY OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER; GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OF DETENTION BUREAU, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:09-cv-00746-JAB-PTS)

Submitted:

May 20, 2010

Decided:

May 27, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Widemon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Joseph dismissing complaint. Widemon appeals his the 42 district U.S.C. court's § 1983 case order (2006) to a

without The

prejudice district

court

referred

this

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2006). The magistrate judge recommended that Widemon's complaint be

dismissed without prejudice and advised Widemon that failure to file objections to this recommendation could waive appellate

review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Collins, Thomas v. 766 Arn, F.2d 474 841, U.S. 845-46 140 (4th (1985). Cir. 1985); Wright v. see has also waived

Widemon

appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the

district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional

would

process. AFFIRMED

2