US v. Dustin Hill


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:09-hc-02069-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998459691] [10-6213]

Download PDF
US v. Dustin Hill Doc. 0 Case: 10-6213 Document: 22 Date Filed: 11/04/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6213 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. DUSTIN ALAN HILL, Defendant Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:09-hc-02069-BR) Submitted: September 20, 2010 Decided: November 4, 2010 Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Jane E. Pearce, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Susan Umstead, Research and Writing Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E. B. Holding, United States Attorney, Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, David T. Huband, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Case: 10-6213 Document: 22 Date Filed: 11/04/2010 Page: 2 PER CURIAM: Dustin Hill appeals the district court's order finding that he continues to satisfy the criteria for commitment set forth at 18 U.S.C. 4246(a) (2006) and continuing his commitment to the custody of the Attorney General. We affirm. At a hearing, Dr. Jill Grant, a clinical psychologist at FMC-Butner, testified that Hill suffers from disorganized type of schizophrenia. Evaluators also gave Hill a "rule-out" diagnosis of schizo-affective disorder, bipolar type, "based on his symptoms the of mania, hypomania, Dr. Holly and depressive an episodes throughout evaluator, years." that Rogers, independent disorganized concurred Hill suffers from schizophrenia. only partially She testified that Hill's psychiatric illness is controlled with medication and that his poor judgment and poor impulse control increase the likelihood of future dangerousness. Dr. Rogers agreed with Dr. Grant that Hill satisfies the criteria for continued commitment set forth in 4246. Based on this testimony and other evidence of record, including a forensic update, the district court found by clear and convincing evidence that Hill meets the criteria for commitment. The court ordered that Hill's commitment continue. reviewing the record, we conclude that the After district court did not clearly err in its determination that Hill presently suffers "from a mental disease or defect as a 2 Case: 10-6213 Document: 22 Date Filed: 11/04/2010 Page: 3 result of which his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to property of another." See 18 U.S.C. 4246(a); United States v. Cox, 964 F.2d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir. 1992) (stating standard of review). We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?