US v. John Riddick, Sr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:00-cr-00067-JBF-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998444177] [10-6242]
<![CDATA[
US v. John Riddick, Sr.
Doc. 0
Case: 10-6242 Document: 12
Date Filed: 10/13/2010
Page: 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6242 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOHN D. RIDDICK, SR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:00-cr-00067-JBF-2) Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 13, 2010
Before KING, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John D. Riddick, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorneys, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case: 10-6242 Document: 12
Date Filed: 10/13/2010
Page: 2
PER CURIAM: John D. Riddick, Sr., appeals the district court's We have
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, United
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
States v. Riddick, No. 2:00-cr-00067-JBF-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2008). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions the court are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the materials decisional
would
process. AFFIRMED
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
