US v. Bruce Johnson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998400492] [10-6271]

Case: 10-6271

Document: 7

Date Filed: 08/11/2010

Page: 1

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6271 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRUCE LEE JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2) Submitted: July 20, 2010 GREGORY, Circuit Decided: Judges, August 11, 2010 and HAMILTON,

Before NIEMEYER and Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II, Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorneys, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Case: 10-6271

Document: 7

Date Filed: 08/11/2010

Page: 2

PER CURIAM: Bruce Lee Johnson appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. United States, 2010 WL 2400109 (U.S. June

See Dillon v. 2010) (No.

17,

09-6338); United States v. Dunphy, 531 F.3d 247, 250-52 (4th Cir. 2009). the district Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by court. (D.S.C. United Feb. 1, States 2010). v. Johnson, We No. 4:02-croral

00579-CWH-2

dispense

with

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

2